Adam actually had a podcast using that Charlie Rose:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MYN593hNANg
Note the top thumbs-up comment calling Adam out.
If you did watch the full one, using your 23min to 30min frame:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VJcHiPusTS0
then it is obvious Adam is being dishonest and misrepresenting some of Clinton's words. At one point, it is clear she is speaking on behalf of what she thinks some Iranians are thinking, while Adam cuts those words out of context to make it sound like she is speaking on her own behalf or that of Americans. Lesson learned: Always use a funny ascent when speaking for someone else so you can't be quoted out of context. She didn't even deepen her voice to sound like a man!
To give Adam the benefit of the doubt, perhaps he never saw the entire clip himself. But that stills shows him to be easily duped by some YouTube editors and a bit irresponsible for letting something make it into his podcast without checking up on the source material.
COINTELPRO seems to be inspiring Quid Pro Quo.
Btw, I support Iran, Russia, and China on this issue. However, I think using the tactic of misquoting out of context and using bad video editing is a bad method that can backfire.
Also, for the record, I think the original, entire clip was already bad enough in context. Baker and Clinton are revealed as either being idiots or liars or both.